Sittin' on the Front Porch
The ramblings and meanderings of a middle-aged mind trapped in a middle-aged body might seem pointless, but points are not always well taken and they do not always add up. With two small children and a loving and lovely wife to keep me centered, I set off to explore ideas and ideals, and I try not to try too much.
Wednesday, November 23, 2016
Tuesday, October 14, 2014
Calico Beans
Labels: calico beans, comfort food, friendship, memory, recipe
Monday, August 09, 2010
Amen
Because amen comes at the end of prayers, we might be tempted to think of it as a way of signing off, a kind of goodbye, but that would be a wrong assumption (which is what we get for allowing ourselves to be tempted). When I was in high school, CB radios took hold of popular culture, insinuating themselves into movies and television and music so that everyone, whether he or she actually had ever used one of the devices, became familiar with them--and especially with the code-talk employed by CB users. Thus, everyone knew that ten-four was a way of saying that the message was clear, a way of signifying that the speaker had comprehended what was being said. Amen is sort of the same thing.
Any time we use words with someone else, we have usually have to use some kind of cue which says to the other person that we are finished. That is why we use closings in letters and why we say goodbye on the telephone. When we end a phone conversation, we say goodbye to mark the end; it says that we are finished and we are signaling the conclusion. After the click from the other end of the line, we know it is over and we go on with the next thing. (All of this, of course, is moot if the phone call happens to be one of those of the true-love adolescent variety that drags on ad nauseum with the "no, you hang up" kinds of verbiage, usually delivered in sticky-sweet tones and accompanied by coos and giggles. Note that here, adolescent does not refer to a particular age, as many so-called adults have been known to engage in such behaviors.) Amen is not goodbye.
We need to understand that when we talk, some words are for the benefit of the listener and some for the speaker. We usually assume that what we are saying is all for the listener, but that is not always how it works. Amen is a word that we use mainly for our own benefit: God already knows what is in our hearts and what is in our minds, so our prayers are put into words so that we will focus on our own words. Amen tells us--not God--that the prayer has concluded.
A Hebrew word that was adopted into Greek by the early church and then disseminated throughout Western languages, ending up in English by way of Latin (probably), amen shows up not just at the conclusion of the Lord's Prayer, but at the end of most all Christian prayers. We have latched onto the word and held on for life. Nothing wrong with that, but as with all the other words, we have to think about it and not just let ourselves say syllables that we do not understand. The word means "so be it," "truly," "verily." In essence, we are telling God (and ourselves) that we endorse these words, that we believe these words, that what we have said is sincere. It is like using sincerely as the closing in a letter.
The reason we need to be aware of the difference between amen as sincerely and amen as the end is simple: we have to remember that, while we might see ending a prayer as somehow like hanging up the telephone at the end of a conversation, it is actually much more like being on the end of a baby monitor. God does not stop listening to us just because we say amen. He is still there. He is still aware of what is going on in our hearts and in our minds. We might forget about God, forget about his being there, but He never forgets about us.
Prayer is important. It is vital. It is essential. We have to pray. We have to take time out of each day--and preferably take time more than once each day--to speak with God. The amen is a marker for us, a way for us to focus our thoughts toward God. God is still with us after amen, and that is one of the greatest blessings in our lives.
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Forever
As Christians, we live a duality: we do have forever and we don't. We ought to be accustomed to paradoxes, but we really aren't. On the one hand, we have eternal life through the salvation that is ours by the blood of Christ Jesus; on the other hand, we are living here, in this world, for right now, and the life we have here is not eternal. Our problem, sometimes, is that we confuse the two, acting as if we have eternity on earth and as if eternity is something small enough for us to comprehend. Thus, we have two problems stemming from the same word, and we have to come to terms with both of them.
On the one hand, we have the issue of thinking that we have eternity on earth--that our corporal self will last forever. I am, as I write this, on the cusp of turning fifty--a milestone of sorts, to be sure, but also a signal. We are given a limited amount of time on this earth, and we really need to be aware of it. Not morbidly aware, counting down the days until our demise, fixating on death like Emmeline Grangerford in Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. (Emmeline was the deceased daughter of one of the feuding families Huck encounters when the raft is struck by a steamboat and he is separated from Jim; Emmeline has left behind an impressive body of work, including poetry and paintings, all dealing with death, and in her last painting, an unfinished work, she has drawn a mourning figure with three sets of arms, each set in a different posture of grief, which results in a kind of American folk-art manifestation of Shiva, the Hindu god of destruction.)
We should not immerse ourselves in thoughts of death, but in the reality that we have limited time to do whatever we are supposed to do. We cannot put off everything for that nebulous someday; we have to seize the day. How much of our lives do we spend procrastinating? How many things have we put on hold? We must be aware of the fact that, although we are eternal beings, through Christ, we are temporal beings nonetheless. This applies to things of the earth, things like taking a particular trip or spending time with people we care about doing things we want to do, but it also applies to our Christian selves: we have to be cognizant of how much time we have (or don't have) to take care of the things God has directed us to do during our brief tenure on this particular piece of space rock.
We have been commissioned to perform certain tasks while we are here, and we need to realize that these are not things we can put off indefinitely. We are to live our lives as Christ would live, and that--though never truly attainable--is something we should be doing now. We (or at least I) have a tendency toward putting things off until a more convenient time. That might mean tomorrow, if the thing in question is related to my job; it might mean as far away in future as possible if the thing in question is a chore that I really don't want to do. We often take this same approach to dealing with "chores" we are supposed to be doing as Christians, whether that be sharing the message with those around us or ministering to the needy or loving our enemies. No matter what God might ask us to do, we need to realize that our duty is to embrace that task in a timely manner. We have to be aware of the limitations of time here on earth.
On the other hand, we need to dissuade ourselves of the notion that we can comprehend eternity. We might have a vague, fuzzy idea about it as a concept, but we cannot begin to understand it for what it really is.
Eternity, like its sibling Infinity, is easy enough to grasp as an abstract idea: no matter how far you go, you get to keep adding one--and then another one and another one and so on. Beyond this (and there is a pun lurking somewhere in there), eternity runs in two directions. (Infinity is much more multi-dimensional, running in all directions at once.) While we might be able to wrap our minds around the concept--and that might be iffy--we cannot in any way wrap our heads around the real thing. It is outside our meager abilities.
Buzz Lightyear's motto is "To infinity. . . and beyond." When we first heard this, many years (and a couple of sequels) ago, we probably chuckled. We laughed because we know that there is nothing beyond infinity, that it keeps going forever; to tack on the "and beyond" displays a naivete and a misunderstanding of the idea itself. However, even though we might perceive the humor inherent in the Buzz Lightyear sound bite, we do not always readily recognize that we fall into the same kind of trap when we pretend to comprehend the reality of either infinity or eternity.
The reason this is so important to us as Christians is that, to reiterate a point made elsewhere, we have to be aware of the difference between what we can do and what God can do. God can comprehend infinity; we cannot. God can comprehend eternity; we cannot. This ought to put us properly in our place relative to our relationship with God.
Even though forever is outside our purview as mere mortals, it is still important for us to acknowledge, and not just because it sets a clear boundry between us and God. Eternity puts God in perspective for us, in a weird way, because we can see (at least in theory) how awesome He truly is.
But in another way, forever also serves as a part of the Golden Ticket, for those looking for the reward (and almost all of us do). What is the thing most people really want? Time. Through Christ, we are promised eternity. We get all the time and then some.
Forever is a big thing. But God is bigger.
talk about the idea that we cannot comprehend eternity
To infinity and beyond
Friday, June 04, 2010
And the Glory
But I am not, as I said, suggesting that glory has lost its meaning. I am only saying that most of us use the word so seldomly that we might have forgotten what it means. It is a word rich in meaning, chock-full of definitions. It means, in various usages, exaltation or achievement or praise (especially of a deity) or awesome splendor or astounding beauty or heaven. You can see the possible overlap among the definitions. No wonder we save the word for church: if ever there were a God word, this is it. And, according the prayer, this too is God's. You can look it up.
Maybe it is the church context, but when I think of this word, I think of the Latin: Gloria; and I think of a song--not the Bach or the Handel, though it is most definitely perfect for explaining the word--I think of the Van Morrison song, recorded with the garage-rock band Them. In the song, the young Morrison sings about his girlfriend--no, sings may be too limited a word: he exalts his girlfriend. He lifts her up and places her on that pedestal that is the center of so much teen angst. Morrison uses words (and music) to treat his girlfriend in exactly the way we should be treating God. He makes her the center of his universe and the only thing that matters.
Think about that for just a moment: think about teenage love. Imagine yourself sixteen again; imagine that you are thinking about the object of your affection. A teenage boy in love with a teenage girl (and I am going to limit my observation to that particular configuration because it is the only one I have experienced first-hand) lives with only one thought and only one purpose: the girl. We, as Christians, need to remember how to love like that--because that is how we ought to love our God. Every moment of every day should be lived with Christ at its center and with a spirit thankful to God. To give God His glory requires that we acknowledge the greatness of God in all things. To do what we ought to do is beyond our ability, but there is a reason for that.
In education, there are times that we need to have students take a test that cannot be aced. We all have encountered those students who make perfect scores on everything. When dealing with gifted students, it sometimes feels as if we cannot gauge their abilities--that is when we need to find a test that goes beyond. I have worked with some middle school students who have been identified as gifted, and in order to better ascertain their particular strengths, these students have taken college placement tests--the ACT and the SAT--tests that many high school juniors and seniors find daunting. Having the middle school students take tests that they have almost no hope of completing perfectly allows teachers and administrators to get an idea about each student. The fact that we can never truly glorify God as much as we should does something of the same thing: it allows us to always continue working toward what we should be doing. We many never make a perfect score, but the real point is that we keep trying.
Whichever definition we choose to apply to the word in the context of our relationship with God, it all comes down to basically the same thing: God is amazing. We need to celebrate God, and not just on certain days. We should be celebrating God with each breath we take. We all know those Christians who show up for church at Christmas and at Easter; we also know the ones who show up each time the door of the sanctuary is open. But any of us who limits God to the time we spend in church is missing out on wonderful opportunities. We have to expand our horizons for our time with God.
When we sing "to God be the glory, great things He hath done," we are saying that God deserves praise for the awesome stuff that He has done; but, how do we go about praising? Does it always have to be in one of the church ways? Is praise limited to prayer or song? Are words required at all? I like to think that our praise ought to encompass much more of what we do. Our lives should be praise to God. As Christians we have to ask ourselves whether we are living our lives as praise.
A couple of years ago, WWJD bracelets were everywhere. And we all need to think about Christ as a role model: we need to ask ourselves what Jesus would do as we make our own choices. However, we have to realize that we might be clinging to our autonomy again if we merely ask about the choices Christ would make--that is, if we become a filter for things, even with Christ in mind. I think that what really needs to happen is that we need to ask instead what is Jesus doing--we need to let God act through us and instead of filtering things ourselves, we need to be filtered through Christ. Once again it becomes a matter of whom we have placed in charge--and even though we might have Christ in mind, we have to relinquish control if we want Christ to truly shine in our lives.
And a shining life if what we need in order to truly glorify God. We are all tarnished because we are all human. We can do nothing to show the wonder and awesomeness of God. But we can allow God to show through us. Okay, technically, allowing is doing something. The one thing we can do is make the right choice. God's glory is the same with or without any one of us; however, we have the option of being connected to it. That choice is the most important thing any one of us can ever do. It is the choice that makes all the difference.
Friday, May 07, 2010
And the Power
Someone might be tempted to pull out their big book of Lord Acton quotes: "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely." So, does that mean that God, who has absolute power, has been corrupted by that power? Think about it: the quotation is man-made, so it is not perfect; the quote is about man's abuse of power; and the power that man has is merely the illusion of power. First, Lord Acton's famous quotation is flawed at its premise: no man can have absolute power. It very well could be true that the more power a person has, the more corrupt he might tend to be, which makes the idea worth considering; however, absolute power is no more possible for one of us than absolute knowledge or absolute love. As humans, we cannot achieve these absolutes. For us, they are theoritical; for God, they are real. God is outside the limitations of man, a truth which bothers many mortals--especially, it seems, those who confuse God and religion. While God can and does have absolute power, He does not suffer the same limitations which beset man: He is not tempted to abuse the power because He has no need to. He has nothing to gain by abusing His power. Power tends to corrupt because it is, in our hands, tainted by the sinful nature of man. (Not being misanthropic, merely observant.) However, when we give it back to God--when we act as a conduit instead of pretending to be the source--great things are possible.
When we are young, we might play with ideas like "Can God make a boulder so heavy that He cannot lift it?" This Christian koan, while perhaps interesting to think about, misses the point about the Truth of God: God is beyond our limitations. While we cannot imagine that God could do both things, God is not limited to our physical world. We have to be a bit more like the White Queen, from Through the Looking-Glass, who tells Alice that "sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast." We like to try to fit God into a shape that we can easily manage. We have been told that man is made in God's image, but we twist it around so that God is supposed to be in our image. It is not an equation.
Our local newspaper runs a contest each year as Father's Day approaches; they ask for photographs for a Father-Son look-alike contest, and they usually receive a number of entries, some more convincing than others. Yet, no matter how much the son may resemble his father, the two will not be identical. We, as the children of God, may resemble our Father, but we should not think that we are exactly like God. We also have to keep in mind how the genealogy chart flows: the father's genes are passed on to the son; it does not work in the other direction. But we sometimes tend to want to do that to God.
Another game we might have played when we were children--something that some of us never get over--we might play with the idea of which super power we would most like to possess. I have asked my high school freshmen about this, usually when we are studying The Odyssey, and I always get an interesting variety of responses. While it is unlikely that any of us will mutate into a super being, we can expect to be blessed with powers that are beyond ourselves. Just as the followers in the early church were visited by the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, we too can be transformed by the Holy Spirit. We can be the vehicle for God's power in our own part of the kingdom. However, we have to remember that all super heroes have not only a power but also a weakness, an Achilles' heel, a kryptonite. Our weakness, in God's kingdom, is ourselves.
When we begin to think that we are the source of our own power, we destroy that power. We must realize that God is the source, that God is at the heart of anything that we accomplish. By ignoring the true source, we cut off our connection to that source and we lose our power. While our intentions might still be noble, we cannot hope to achieve at the same level without God. There are many people who want to do good things in the world, but they want to do them without God. God may be pleased by the intentions of these Good Deed Doers (as the Wizard of Oz would call them), but because He has been cut out, the intentions cannot be fulfilled to the degree that they might have.
Think about small children playing make-believe. If we watch them, we see that there is an earnestness in their efforts, that they believe in what they are doing much more than we would. It is part of growing up. It is part of human development: we play at things before we actually do them. We play house, we play school, we play work. From a grown-up vantage point, all this play might seem fun and silly, but for the children, it is intentional. The same kind of thing happens when we try to do good things without God: we play at doing it. We are children, after all, and from God's vantage point, we are just like those children playing make-believe, we are going through the motions without really accomplishing anything. But, you say, things still get done even if the person doing them has not included God. Yes--and no. Yes, something will get done; but, think about what might have been possible if God had been doing the work instead of us. Think about a little girl playing at baking: she might make mud-pies all by herself, or she might make cupcakes--even if it is in an EasyBake Oven--when an adult helps out. God is the grown-up who helps us.
We can do great things as God's creations, but we can do greater things when we allow God to work through us. I think of the scene in the first Harry Potter book (and movie) where Mr. Ollivander, the wizard who sells wands from his shop in Diagon Alley, tells young Harry that he expects great things from him and also that the wand that has "chosen" Harry is a twin to the wand that belonged to Voldemort, the evil wizard who killed Harry's parents and gave Harry the lightning-bolt scar on his forehead. Because I have an English-major tendency to see allusions and allegory lurking everywhere, I think of this scene in Christian terms: Voldemort, who is evil incarnate (and whose familiar is a serpent), is obviously Satan, and Harry, even though he is the hero of the story, is very much an Everyman character; the idea that they have a common bond resonates with the idea that we, as God's children, have a common bond with Satan, who is also a child of God, and that we are both fallen creatures. Satan was not--and is not--willing to allow God to work through him; we have to make the choice of whether we are willing to allow God to work through us. Harry Potter is able to defeat Voldemort in his various encounters with him because Harry possesses certain qualities which are foreign to Voldemort: love, empathy, compassion, honor--and, most importantly, a connection with those outside himself. Voldemort uses those around him but does not care about them; he sees himself as the most powerful, the most perfect. We must choose whether we want to be Harry or He-who-must-not-be-named: we can focus on ourselves or we can use ourselves to focus the power that comes from outside us. We can accept God's presence in our lives and allow Him to work through us to achieve great things. Or, we can fail.
Monday, April 26, 2010
Yours is the Kingdom
This place where we are, whether we be talking about the universe or the planet or the immediate environs or our bodies, belongs to Him, and He has given us all of this. We have been charged with taking care of the part of the kingdom that we inhabit. That charge includes not just taking care of the place we reside, but also the whole planet and our own bodies. We have been entrusted with something, and we are expected to watch over it.
Most of us can understand the part about taking care of our homes, and we also probably get the part about our homes including the planet. We might even grasp that taking care of ourselves is tacit to the agreement. Personal responsibility makes sense to most people. However, we also have to come to understand that we are expected to take care of each other. This is not an every-man-for-himself situation, no matter how bad things might look at any given moment.
Here is how this works: this is God's kingdom; we are members of the kingdom; we implies that there are others beyond ourselves; in a kingdom, all the citizens work together for the common good of the order; as members of God's kingdom, we have the responsibility of working together for those others who are also members of the kingdom. Further, not everyone realizes that he is a member of the kingdom of God. I have a bumpersticker in my classroom which states "God doesn't believe in atheists." We are all in this together. All means all.
When I teach students about archetypes in literature, I make a point about the most essential difference between the hero and the villain: the hero is selfless and the villain is selfish. The two may share many qualities, such as intelligence and strength and power, but the true difference is that they see the world around them in totally different ways. As part of this archetype lesson, I also explain that the hero represents the qualities which a culture values most. If this is true--and I hope it is, since I teach it to impressionable young minds--then our culture values selflessness. I like to believe that. I also know that, as with everything else, we do not always live up to this ideal.
So, what is my responsibility to those around me? How far to I have to extend my reach? A few phrases come immediately to mind: widows and orphans, the least of these. It makes sense that we would help those who cannot help themselves; but what makes sense is not always what is done. Voltaire said "Common sense is not so common." I would extend that to "Common decency is not so common, either." It is very easy for us to get caught up in our own lives and not pay attention to what is happening around us. During a disaster, we will, as a unified whole, step up and take care of those who have been affected. But we have to be aware of those whose daily existence borders on disaster.
We might be tempted to shirk our responsibility to those in need by pointing to government programs designed to help. It reminds me of Ebenezer Scrooge inquiring about the work-houses and debtors' prisons when he has been asked for a donation. We cannot expect the government to do our duty as Christians. I am not saying that government programs are bad; I am also not saying that they are good. They exist, and they will help some people; but we cannot use them as an escape from our personal responsibility as members of the kingdom. We must be active in our response to Christ.
Besides the widows and orphans and the least of these, we also have to consider that Christ admonishes us to pray for our enemies. We don't get to draw lines and create borders to separate us from everyone else. We are all in the together--even if the ones who don't know they are in it. We do not have the luxury of hate. As Christians, as self-aware members of God's kingdom, we have the responsibility to all others in the kingdom. But, again, what is that responsibility.
Part of it is the physical well-being of every member of the kingdom, but that is a transient thing. The more important mission set before us is one with eternal ramifications: we are to further the kingdom--we, as Christians, are called to share the kingdom with others.
Wait, you say. The others are already in the kingdom. Yes--and no. To make a trivial analogy, imagine that you have basic cable service for your television. Imagine that everyone has the same service. Now imagine that you discover that, because of a special promotion from the cable company, everyone is getting free movie channels for a month, but the company has not advertised this special and so only a few people know about it. You find out about it from a friend. You tell your friends. However, there are people out there who are not aware that they have this special service.
This analogy, of course, is flawed (I created it). but it can (I think) make its point: being in the kingdom and being aware of being in the kingdom are not automatically the same thing. We, as Christians, see God's creation for what it is; not everyone has our perspective. Not everyone can see--actually, not everyone will see--it is a matter of choice and opportunity, not a matter of ability. We, as Christians, have been blessed with the opportunity to know the Truth of God, and, by God's Grace, we have been offered the choice of accepting that Truth. It is our duty, then, to share that opportunity with those around us--whoever they might be.
The kingdom is an awesome place, whether we think of it as the physical creation in which we live or the metaphysical creation in which we exist. We have no right to hide and horde our knowledge of the kingdom; further, we have the responsibility to reach out with our knowledge to those around us. Being a citizen in God's kingdom, just as being a citizen in any jurisdiction, has its rights and responsibilities, and we have to remember that.
